måndag 23 mars 2009

Sika Äpärä tillbaka

Det är årets konstigaste återförening.
Fanzinet Sika Äpärä är tillbaka efter att legat i dvala i drygt 10 år.
Och någon gång i år släpps nummer 5.
I en tråd hos Profane Existence släpper Finn-Fan bomben officiellt.

Men redan för en månad sedan ungefär fick jag ett förhandsexemplar (pdf) med en lång och jävligt intressant Homy Hogs-intervju, av Finn-Fan.
Finnen skrev:
"Tidningen är väl Sikas svar på Discharges "Grave new world" (vilket dock är 1000ggr bättre än dagens pinsamheter med Rat). Sikas målgrupp är väl alla diverse 40 plussare från förr och har nog inget att tillägga till dagens punkscene (har inget känedom om den)."

"Enda anledningen till att Sika 5 görs är att L.T från Homy Hogs vill göra en sista intervju och på så sätt sätta punkt för epoken Homy Hogs. Istället för vanliga anti-pc grejen, så går tidningen ytterligare ett steg och tar tydlig ställning mot vänstern (och lyfter fram vettiga politiker som Ronald Reagan och George Bush)."

"Bla bla bla bla... skitsamma... några 40+ läser tidningen i förbifarten i sina stressiga liv med blöjor, ungar och varm choklad... De skrattar väl till ett par gånger och tidningen förpassas sedan till historiens sophög. Några av dem från förr, som har fastnat i utvecklingen, blir väl förbannade och sjunger Internationalen och säger jävla finne, men annars lär det väl inte bli så mycket väsen."

För 20 år (februari 1990) sedan gjorde den första intervjuen med Finn-Fan och Jallo. Jag bodde då i Fagersta. Och Finn Records hade precis givit ut sina tre första sjuor. Över några glas vin delade Finn-Fan och Jallo ut verbala snytingar åt höger och vänster. Artikeln publicerades i Profit Blaskan #11, det sista numret av tidningen (men man vet ju aldrig...).

41 kommentarer:

Staffan Malmgren sa...

"...fick jag ett förhandsexemplar (pdf)"

Är det hela datorframställt, eller är det traditionell klipp-och-klistra-kaos-layout?

Slobodan Burgher sa...

sa dar ja...heheh

Susanne sa...

Fan vad underbart.

Mikael Sörling sa...

Staffan: Klipp-och-klistra-kaos så klart.

Anonym sa...

äähhh.... layouten i sika 5 är mer prydlig, typ en mellanting mellan datorframställt och det gamla (att layouta "the old way" är för jobbigt och tidskrävande...

sörling kanske kan kanske publicera det preliminära omslaget?

Peter sa...

Då ser vi fram emot Profitblaskan 12 nästa år.

Anonym sa...

Kan tilläggas att Sika Äpärä INTE samarbetar med "Punk Illegal".

Mikael Johnsson sa...

Kul att det kommer ut ett sista? nummer av Sika!

jj sa...

i väntan på sika äpärä, så kan man ju alltid följa följande blogg för att komma i ni rätt stämning
http://erixon.com/blogg

Slobodan Burgher sa...

Halv-pinsamt har jag glomt av att Sika kom ut med ett 4:e nr, nagon som orkar scana till PunksIsHippies.com??

Jan sa...

Ska bli förbannat ballt att se en ny Sika. Homy Hogs-intervjuer flödar det ju inte av direkt. Trodde knappt dom gav intervjuer. Ska bli en höjdare att se.
Och så Stoodes också. Låter schysst som fan det. Vad mer?

jj sa...

jan.... det blir inte så mycket mer... pallar inte....

som sagt besök Dick Erixon - i hjärtat rebell under tiden....

Crille sa...

Later mer som ett FOX NEWS i fanzine-form an ett nytt nummer av Sika..far hoppas att Homy Hogs-inten ar bra iaf.
Intressant att Reagan och Bush avfardas som "vettiga" da bagge tva ar kanda for att ha hojt skatterna avsevart, vilket brukar vara mer populart bland socialister an kapitalister...

Anonym sa...

Reta vänstern in i rödvinsdimman igen...

Barack Obama is a radical communist...

jj sa...

klippt från wikipedia:

Bush ekonomiska politik kom under hans första mandatperiod att präglas av hans stora skattesänkningsprogram på 2,3 biljoner dollar som var en av de största skattesänkningarna i amerikansk historia.

Reagan implemented policies based on supply-side economics and advocated a classical liberal and laissez-faire philosophy, seeking to stimulate the economy with large, across-the-board tax cuts

Om man påstår att Reagan var socialist, så är det ett tecken på att det är dags att lägga mäskdunken åt sidan ett tag...

Yes, we can (Reagan Remix) v2.0

RONALD REAGAN SPEAKS OUT AGAINST SOCIALIZED MEDICINE & SOCIALISM!!

Ronald Reagan on Capitalism and Socialism

Ronald Reagan - Curbing the Size of Government

Ronald Regan on Self Government

President Reagan - Government is the Problem

Ronald Reagan - A Time for Choosing (October 27, 1964)

Ronald Reagan Speech - 1964 Republican National Convention

George W. Bush Inaugural Address 2005 Part1>

George W. Bush Inaugural Address 2005 Part2

George W. Bush: Second Inaugural Address

Margaret Thatcher on Socialism

Margaret Thatcher: Free Society Speech (1975)

Globalisation is Good - Johan Norberg on Globalization

Reagan var för fan mer punk än varenda j-a crass-punkare ihop...

Fox news är bästa & mest balanserade nyhetskanalen. Enda anledningen till att de sticker ut är att alla andra är så j-a kommunistiska...
FOX NEWS

Leffe sa...

Ja, Reagan var rätt ball. Han citerade Clintan en gång och sa: "Make my day" riktat till ryssarna. Det gillade jag som fan. Sen var det ju i viss grad hans förtjänst att ryssarna till sist "gav upp" Kalla kriget. När han drog igång snacket om rymdrobotförsvaret insåg ryssarna att de inte hade resurser att haka på längre. Det var en påskyndande faktor för Gorbatjovs Glasnost och Perestrojka. Annars skiter väl jag på det hela taget i politikfittsås. Fast å andra sidan var kanske Sovjet egentligen räddningen för Västvärlden, den kommer ju att gå åt helvete, så om Sovjet hade fått styra hade det ju inte varit möjligt, men å andra sidan hade ju människorna haft ett helvete på annat sätt.
Men en stor eloge till dig som provokatör, Jari.
En riktig rebell vänder inte kappan efter vinden.

jj sa...

Leffe, precis. Reagans star wars (som kanske var en bluff) knäckte den ekonomiska ryggraden hos ryssarna.

Reagan, liksom Bush, fjantade sig aldrig med totalitära krafter.
Vänstern tror att man kan äta kakor och dricka thé med dessa totalitära mörkermän och sedan komma överens (om alla bara är snälla, så blir det bra, ska du ha en kaka till?)
Se hur det gick för Neville "fred i vår tid" Chamberlain. Hitlers bravader borde vara väl kända idag.
JFK, som är hela vänsterns favorit president, visade ryssarna att han i grund och botten var en mespropp i och med kubakrisen, vilket ledde till att ryssarna vågade mura en mur runt hela västberlin. En mur som inte revs förrän efter sovjets kollaps.
Jimmy Carter gav Iran till mullorna genom sin inkompetens kring gisslankrisen etc. Givetvis fick denne, sämste president i modern tid, nobels fredspris. Ett pris som även har tilldelats terroristen Yassir arafat och tokstollen al gore.
hela nobel rörelsen, liksom FN bara är trams. Lägg ned nobels fredspris och lägg ned FN, som ger legitimitet till varenda j-a terrorstat. FN, där iran leder rådet för mänskliga rättigheter, samtidigt som de hängar alla homosexuella. FN, där zimbabwe leder rådet för hållbar utveckling samtidigt som de har själva en ekonomi i total kollaps och med svält och elände i dess följd...

Det är skrämmande att vi fortfarande 2009 har kommunister i riksdagen. Vänsterpartiet slutade inte skicka hyllningsbrev till moskva pga en plötslig tillnyktering utan pga att adressaten upphörde.

Lyssna vad Reagan avslutar sin klassiska "tear down this wall"-tal med. Det är ett budskap till varenda j-a stenkastande fåntratt som deltar i alla dessa protester mot usa, globalisering, g8 etc... sätt in militären nästa gång....

Ronald Reagan's "Tear Down this Wall" speech 1 of 3

Ronald Reagan's "Tear Down this Wall" speech 2 of 3

Sök
Ladda upp
Ronald Reagan's "Tear Down this Wall" speech 3 of 3

Liberal som faan sa...

Lagg ner skiten for fan - istallet for att gravskanda Sika med ditt effektsokande och meningslosa neo-kon dravel kan du ju aterga till att klaga pa det 'elaka socialistlandet' som forsett dig med mojligheter till en redig utbildning, snyltarsvin.

Har du nansin tillbringat en langre tid i Usa (tror knappast det) eller gar du bara efter vad tokstollen Hannity & hans anhang tutar i dig pa tv?

e t d sa...

;-)

jj sa...

så i sverige måste man var god socialist och tacksam för att få tillgång till högre utbildning? i och för sig så är ju utbildningen väldigt vänstervriden...
Det blir att nöje att krossa din Sika Äpärä illusion....

Ur Ayn Rand: Atlas shrugged /när världen skälvde:
"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce. Is this what you consider evil?

"When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the looters who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears not all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor--your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money, Is this what you consider evil?

"Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions--and you'll learn that man's mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.

"But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is made--before it can be looted or mooched--made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can't consume more than he has produced.'

"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss--the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery--that you must offer them values, not wounds--that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of goods. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men's stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best that your money can find. And when men live by trade--with reason, not force, as their final arbiter--it is the best product that wins, the best performance, the man of best judgment and highest ability--and the degree of a man's productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?

"But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.

"Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants: money will not give him a code of values, if he's evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he's evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law which he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

"Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth--the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you; loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one, would not bring back the dead virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve the mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

"Money is your means of survival. The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men's vices or men's stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment's or a penny's worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you'll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?

"Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of money?

"Or did you say it's the love of money that's the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money--and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it.

"Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.

"Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another--their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.

"But money demands of you the highest virtues, if you wish to make it or to keep it. Men who have no courage, pride or self-esteem, men who have no moral sense of their right to their money and are not willing to defend it as they defend their life, men who apologize for being rich--will not remain rich for long. They are the natural bait for the swarms of looters that stay under rocks for centuries, but come crawling out at the first smell of a man who begs to be forgiven for the guilt of owning wealth. They will hasten to relieve him of the guilt--and of his life, as he deserves.

"Then you will see the rise of the men of the double standard--the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money--the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law--men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims--then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

"Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion--when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing--when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors--when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you--when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice--you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that is does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.

"Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men's protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it bounces, marked, 'Account overdrawn.'

"When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, 'Who is destroying the world? You are.

"You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it's crumbling around you, while you're damning its life-blood--money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men's history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, whose names changed, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves--slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody's mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer, Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers--as industrialists.

"To the glory of mankind, there was, for the first and only time in history, a country of money--and I have no higher, more reverent tribute to pay to America, for this means: a country of reason, justice, freedom, production, achievement. For the first time, man's mind and money were set free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only fortunes-by-work, and instead of swordsmen and slaves, there appeared the real maker of wealth, the greatest worker, the highest type of human being--the self-made man--the American industrialist.

"If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose--because it contains all the others--the fact that they were the people who created the phrase 'to make money.' No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity--to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. The words 'to make money' hold the essence of human morality.

"Yet these were the words for which Americans were denounced by the rotted cultures of the looters' continents. Now the looters' credo has brought you to regard your proudest achievements as a hallmark of shame, your prosperity as guilt, your greatest men, the industrialists, as blackguards, and your magnificent factories as the product and property of muscular labor, the labor of whip-driven slaves, like the pyramids of Egypt. The rotter who simpers that he sees no difference between the power of the dollar and the power of the whip, ought to learn the difference on his own hide-- as, I think, he will.

"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice--there is no other--and your time is running out."
ayn Rand: Och världen skälvde 39 kr (adlibris)

Susanne sa...

Hålla på å RETA folk!
FY FAN!
Punk ska va snäll å fin!
Inte jiddra!
Sitt fint!
Drick rödvin å håll käft!

Susanne sa...

Fast alla de där kostymjänkarna - Bush & Co - e ju i och för sig ofattbara töntar. Skit i dom - jag diggar dom som vill spränga hela JORDEN åt helvete, typ kejsar Bokassa och såna. Dom vet hur man gör. Dom KAN.

LT sa...

Vad Homy Hogs anbelangar så är det följande som gäller:
Vi gillar Kejsar Bokassa, knulla, stora knulltuttar och är beväpnade.
Mita helvettin samari!
Schystempolacket?
Har tu retan farit? Jak tar pilet!
Och ankåente nekrofilankakelsen:
Jak visschte inte atht hon var töt.
Jak trotte bara hon var från Schuntsvall!

LT sa...

Fy fan.
Måste skaffa alkolås till datorn...

jj sa...

;-)
Problemet är väl att Napoleon, förlåt Bokassa är död....

Ayn Rand - Urkällan 39 kr (adlibris)
The Fountainhead - Howard Roark Speech (Ayn Rand) (Youtube)

Howard Roark Speech:

Judge: The defense may proceed.
Roark: Your Honor, I shall call no witnesses. This will be my testimony and my summation.
Judge: Take the oath.
Court Clerk: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Roark: I do.
Thousands of years ago, the first man discovered how to make fire. He was probably burned at the stake he had taught his brothers to light, but he left them a gift they had not conceived, and he lifted darkness off the earth.
Throughout the centuries, there were men who took first steps down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision. The great creators -- the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors -- stood alone against the men of their time. Every new thought was opposed; every new invention was denounced. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered, and they paid. But they won.
No creator was prompted by a desire to please his brothers. His brothers hated the gift he offered.
His truth was his only motive.
His work was his only goal.
His work -- not those who used it.
His creation -- not the benefits others derived from it -- the creation which gave form to his truth.
He held his truth above all things and against all men. He went ahead whether others agreed with him or not, with his integrity as his only banner. He served nothing and no one. He lived for himself. And only by living for himself was he able to achieve the things which are the glory of mankind. Such is the nature of achievement. Man cannot survive except through his mind. He comes on earth unarmed. His brain is his only weapon. But the mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain. The man who thinks must think and act on his own. The reasoning mind cannot work under any form of compulsion. It cannot be subordinated to the needs, opinions, or wishes of others. It is not an object of sacrifice.
The creator stands on his own judgment; the parasite follows the opinions of others.
The creator thinks; the parasite copies.
The creator produces; the parasite loots.
The creator's concern is the conquest of nature; the parasite's concern is the conquest of men.
The creator requires independence. He neither serves nor rules. He deals with men by free exchange and voluntary choice.
The parasite seeks power. He wants to bind all men together in common action and common slavery. He claims that man is only a tool for the use of others -- that he must think as they think, act as they act, and live in selfless, joyless servitude to any need but his own.
Look at history: Everything we have, every great achievement has come from the independent work of some independent mind. Every horror and destruction came from attempts to force men into a herd of brainless, soulless robots -- without personal rights, without person ambition, without will, hope, or dignity.
It is an ancient conflict. It has another name: "The individual against the collective."
Our country, the noblest country in the history of men, was based on the principle of individualism, the principle of man's "inalienable rights." It was a country where a man was free to seek his own happiness, to gain and produce, not to give up and renounce; to prosper, not to starve; to achieve, not to plunder; to hold as his highest possession a sense of his personal value, and as his highest virtue his self-respect. Look at the results. That is what the collectivists are now asking you to destroy, as much of the earth has been destroyed.
I am an architect. I know what is to come by the principle on which it is built. We are approaching a world in which I cannot permit myself to live. My ideas are my property. They were taken from me by force, by breach of contract. No appeal was left to me.
It was believed that my work belonged to others, to do with as they pleased. They had a claim upon me without my consent -- that it was my duty to serve them without choice or reward.
Now you know why a dynamited Courtland. I designed Courtland. I made it possible. I destroyed it. I agreed to design it for the purpose of it seeing built as I wished. That was the price I set for my work. I was not paid. My building was disfigured at the whim of others who took all the benefits of my work and gave me nothing in return.
I came here to say that I do not recognize anyone's right to one minute of my life, nor to any part of my energy, nor to any achievement of mine -- no matter who makes the claim!
It had to be said: The world is perishing from an orgy of self-sacrificing. I came here to be heard in the name of every man of independence still left in the world. I wanted to state my terms. I do not care to work or live on any others.
My terms are: A man's RIGHT to exist for his own sake.

Samma som forut. sa...

JJ: Jag lamnade bade mina illusioner och mina exemplar av Sika i Sverige. Du kan ju borja med att krossa dina egna illusioner om att nan kommer bry sig om din lilla fjant-tidning.

Med tanke pa hur du stavar ar utbildningen inte bara "vanstervriden", den ar aven javligt undermalig nar det galler att lara sma gnalliga snyltarsvin att stava. FOAD.

Susanne sa...

Men lilla gubben - ta några djupa andetag.
För första gången på åratal kommer ett zine som rör om lite i grytan, får folk att reagera, och kan väcka uppmärksamhet och diskussion även utanför de allra innersta kretsarna.
Kan inte vara fel enligt mig i alla fall.

Min personliga tes är dock att ALLA politiker, förr eller senare, kommer att visa sig vara ett förbannat jävla kräk på det ena eller andra viset.

Se vem du vill framför dig genom historien, låt politikernunorna passera revy framför dig, och inse att tesen är hållbar.

Behäver du vägledning?

OK:

Angående metod avseende tolkning av källmaterial, så är bör den vara kvalitativ med kvantitativa inslag, samt avseende litterära studier kvalitativ och analytiskt komparativ.
Det metodiska perspektivet bör hållas induktivt, det vill säga ett rättfärdigande av kunskap nerifrån och upp, vilket innebär att utgående från iakttagelser av givna fakta försöka komma fram till en allmän regel. Således att genom, förhoppningsvis, riktiga observationer kunna formulera sanna slutsatser efter slika iakttagelser och diskussioner.
Man bör således enligt empiristisk kunskapssyn söka nå och delge empirisk kunskap genom studier av källor från ett konkret förflutet, det vill säga ett relevant källmaterial. Därmed inte sagt att det får saknas utrymme för visst rationalistiskt tänkande i diskussionen, med rimlighetsfaktorer förankrade i generella kunskaper, samt vad som tycks mest logiskt. Därav kan således sägas, att en tolkning, och en slutsats som därpå följer, inte enbart av princip skulle behöva vara en kunskapsprocess av det induktiva slaget, utan att det även kan finnas deduktiva inslag med rättfärdigande av kunskap uppifrån och ned. Det vill säga härledning ur vissa eventuella överordnade satser (som exempelvis logik). Genom att fakta inte är fakta av sig själva, utan att de blir det genom att tolkas i relation till något, synes det naturligt att inte helt utesluta sådana inslag.

Puss & Kram

Sisusuzie

jj sa...

Samma som forut...:
Jag har inga som helst illusioner om att sika 5 kommer att bli något annat än ett tillfälligt tidsfördriv för en väldigt smal grupp av människor (vilket du kan se i Sörlings artikel om att Sika 5 är på väg). Att DU inte tillhör dem står ju klart. Dina personliga problem saknar vi intresse av här... Tidningen är inte till för dig (trots att just DU är så jävla intresserad att du bemödar dig att först läsa om att den är på G och sedan kommentera detta och även återkomma !!!)...
Om du nu är så förtjust i socialist-sverige, så varför har du flyttat härifrån? Flytta till katrineholm för fan....
När det gäller min stavning, så är det en produkt av det socialistiska skitsamhälle vi lever i...alla ska med... tåget rostar fast och kommer ingenstans.... tror du man bryr sig om stavning och ordföljd etc i detta sammanhang?
Kör upp dina jävla morötter i arslet....jäkla Nazi-kommunist... Vänster-elitister är det värsta som finns (de är ju liiiite mer jämlika än andra)... gå drick lite grönt thé till dina groddar...

The Big Lie: Man-made Global Warming

Anonym sa...

gilla bush=trams.ungefär som att gilla "könsrock". näe du finska fan,du behöver komma ut,träffa lite vanligt folk(alf robertson r.i.p).lämna bredäng.ta tuben till alby,t ex. hälsa på mig.dricka grönt TÉ,spliffa lite,snacka skit.

samma som din mamma sa...

JJ: Klart man laser Sorlings blogg, aven nar han skriver om medelalders-krisande losers som skriver fjant-tidningar. Vad det galler hoger/vanster sa ar partipolitik lika ovart som FINN014.

Hippo sa...

Tycker det är jävligt skönt att se att nån av gammelpunkarna tagit sitt förnuft till fånga på äldre dar.
Respekt.

Susanne sa...

tänk vad det kan gnällas så fort det blir lite kaos i ankdammen.
alla kan inte tvingas vara likriktade zombies i den skyddade verkstan.
shit, glömde trycka på Caps Lock.
ja ja, meddelandet kan väl förstås även utan stora bokstäver.

The same... sa...

Susanne: Oh karringjavel, ta & lagg ner hor-tjacket innan du oppnar truten igen. Du + Finn-fjanten kan ta era morotter, groddar, ankdammar & allt annat ovidkommande flum-trams och dra till slumkvarteren...

Susanne sa...

The Same: Din kommentar är så barnslig och desperat att man inte ens borde bevärdiga den med ett svar.

Måste dock klargöra två saker:
1. Jag trodde att även kvinnor omfattades av yttrandefriheten.
2. Jag känner inte någon inom Sika Äpärä, och har överhuvudtaget inte ens någonsin träffat dessa.

jj sa...

hah hah haa... snubben har ju allvarliga problem... det är en som har tagit sika/finn på för stort allvar och får nu en identitetskris... hah hah haa....

När det gäller finn014, så får du ta det med jallu...

jj sa...

Lite musik till kvällens Whiskey...

Kid Rock - All Summer Long

Hank Williams jr.: NAKED WOMEN & BEER

hank williams jr - thats how they do it in dixie

CW sa...

blir en sleazehörna fr yours unruly oxå. ungdomskulturen sågas längs fotknölarna. fast med bra band. läs andy pierce berätta om när cliff käkade piggelin!

vad skulle kunna vara bättre än det?

///CW, critmass/fet

Mikael sa...

Fantastiskt roliga kommentarer. Det blev ju S Ä av bara dem!

Still Punk sa...

Självklart minns jag de kir- och mäskluktande tidningarna för snart 20 år sen. Då satt man och lyssnade på råpunkband som t ex Discharge, Anticimex och Totalitär. På den tiden var man anarkist och fyllerist med skinnjacka, trasiga brallor och kängor. Själv bröt jag aldrig med det politiska, vilket många av mina kompisar gjorde när de läst Sika Äpära. På den tiden trodde jag verkligen att jag alltid skulle vara anarkist och punkare. Hur blev det då, 15 år senare? Jo: kostym på både jobbet och fritiden, 45000 i månadslön, röstade moderat förra valet, röstar SD i höst. Det är punk om något!

Anonym sa...

Sika Äpärä 5 släpps som PDF under augusti månad. Tidningen är bara halvfärdig, men det får duga (har inte tid & lust att hålla på med skiten).

Det är möjligt att CW Hell trycker upp ett gäng papperstidningar i framtiden. Papperstidningen kommer då att innehålla en CD med outgivna Stoodes etc låtar (Deep Torkel).

Läs gärna Johan Norbergs nya bok:
Fragment & Argument
under tiden.
En sammanfattning om hans resa från en ung anarkist och "krossa staten" till kapitalismens fanbärare nr 1 utan att de grundläggande åsikterna om individuell frihet ändras....
(läs även hans två mästerverk: Till världskapitalismens försvar och När människan skapade världen

Johan Norberg medverkar även i Sika Äpärä 5.

Även M-politikern Johnny Munkhammar medverkar med en artikel.

Humor-hörnan är skippad, skämten sprids internt istället....

/JJ

Anonym sa...

Bra - da slipper man betala for skiten.